9-11 and Globalism.
History was being made as the world watched the events of
9/11 on its TV screen, and has not been the same since. As commercial jetliners
crashed into iconic buildings and a field that fateful morning the finger was
pointed at Al Qaeda. America’s reaction was swift. Since the end of communism
the US lacked a global opponent but now had one in Islamic extremism. Originating
in Afghanistan, Islamist groups opposed the US presence in the Middle East and
beyond. US foreign policy imperatives promoting Globalisation allowed US
business interests entry to the economies of Muslim countries which created a
backlash. Extremist groups won support by opposing American domination and the
pathway to 9/11 was paved. In reply to 9/11 Afghanistan and Iraq were invaded
and Muslim culture vilified. As the cost spirals, the US response may well sink
their economy.
There is no universally accepted definition of terrorism
however a United Nations report described terrorism as any “act intended to
cause death or serious bodily harm to civilians or non-combatants with the purpose
of intimidating a population or compelling governments or international
organizations to do or abstain from doing certain acts” (1). The world became only too aware of terrorism as it woke to the
graphic images of passenger jets being used as missiles on September 11, 2001.
The new Millennium which was greeted with universal optimism instantly turned
to terror. The 21st Century has been overshadowed by terrorism, its
effects and costs.
According to the official version of events 19 Islamic
extremists, masterminded by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (2),
right hand man of Osama bin Laden, hijacked two American Airlines and two
United Airlines commercial jetliners on domestic routes on the morning of
Tuesday 11 September 2001. At 8:46am the first plane crashed into New York’s
iconic Twin Towers, north tower and 17 minutes later the southern tower was struck
by the second plane. At 9:38am the third jetliner skilfully ploughed into a
section of the Pentagon and at 10:06 the last hijacked jetliner crashed into a
Pennsylvania field. At 9:59 the Twin Towers south tower spectacularly collapsed
followed 29 minutes later by the north tower. At 5:20pm the nearby 47 storey
WTC7 building collapsed. Approximately 3000 people died in these multiple
atrocities (3).
No organisation claimed responsibility for the attacks and
no demands were received yet within minutes of the first attack, fingers were
being pointed at Osama bin Laden’s Al Qaida network (4). The neo-conservative Bush Administration, used the events of 9/11 to justify
invading Afghanistan and without a United Nations mandate put together a
‘coalition of the willing’ to invade Iraq under the pretext that Saddam
Hussein’s regime was connected with 9/11 and held stockpiles of WMD’s (weapons
of mass destruction). The number of documented civilian deaths in Iraq,
following the US invasion is 101,366 (7) and Bilmes
and Stiglitz (9)puts the cost of the war to the
US taxpayer at US$3 trillion. The body count in Afghanistan is estimated at 20,000
(8) and has so far cost America US$425 billion (6). Afghanistan’s annual GDP is a mere US$27.3
billion (5).
The US’ heavy handed reaction to the events of 9/11 can be
traced to the demise of communism a decade earlier. With the fall of the Berlin
Wall and collapse of the Soviet Union, the US was left by default as the
world’s sole superpower. One by one, communist regimes fell and capitalisms
ideological triumph over socialism was cemented in the ballot box. With no one
to oppose it, the US has had a virtual free hand to implement its foreign
policy anywhere as it sees fit. Without a major enemy to challenge America it
also became difficult to justify the billions of tax payer dollars devoted to
military spending. If America was to continue investing in defence on the same
scale as the Cold War, it needed to find a new enemy. The neo-conservatives
search for a new bogeyman was over and the justification for harsher measures
was found in the image of Osama bin Laden.
Many commentators see the rise of fundamentalist Islamic
groups as a reaction to the US’ unchallenged global power. During the Soviet’s
Afghanistan War (1979-1989) the US provided funding, weapons and training to
extremist groups, including Al Qaeda (10). While
these Mujahedeen groups were busy fighting the US’ Soviet foe, they enjoyed the
support of America. Once the Soviets left Afghanistan these groups turned on US
‘crusader’ imperialism. Jihads against the US and their allies followed with
attacks on US Global interests throughout the world.
US administrations used their global dominance to promote,
if not enforce, their belief in Globalisation (11). While successive US administrations preached democracy and freedom, in practice
they preferred to deal with authoritarian regimes who supported US economic
interests. If democracy was bad for US business, it was preferable to avoid it.
Throughout the world the US supported repressive right wing military or
authoritarian regimes, especially in the Middle East. All the Gulf’s
semi-feudal monarchies enjoy the full backing of the US while they support
America, without any calls for openness or free elections. Yemen’s repressive
regime could count on US support as too could Algeria, Egypt and even Iraq at
various times. Many Muslims cynically believed the US was only interested in controlling
the Middle East’s oil wealth. While the Governments of the Muslim countries of
the Middle East accepted their place in the Globalised economy, they could rely
on US support.
Globalisation has become a chief political objective of US
foreign policy in the last generation. Globalisation involves the integration
of the world’s economy through the removal of barriers to trade. Globalisation
provides multinational corporations access to markets in the expanding
developing world, where their marketing prowess typically allows them to
dominate. Many; perhaps most, global multinational corporations are based in
the US. In the oil rich Muslim countries of the Middle East, Globalisation
policies provides opportunities for US corporations to earn vast profits for
their US shareholders. The presence of US economic, as well as political
interests in Islamic countries is deeply offensive to many Muslims and Islamist
terror groups win support by preaching an anti American and Anti Global
message. Overwhelmed by a sense of helplessness, many Muslims have resorted to
extreme acts to express their displeasure at what they see as US world
domination. The events of 9/11 can be regarded as the ultimate backlash against
the US’ policy of Globalisation and political domination (11).
The events of 9/11 had dramatic political and economic
repercussions that are still being felt, and paid for, a decade later. While
these terrorist atrocities ultimately strengthened the US’ foreign position,
their economy began to count the cost immediately. The attacks had an instant
impact on the world’s travel industry with a dramatic reduction in air travel.
America’s airlines were hard hit and most of them filed for bankruptcy
protection. Other industries which were directly affected included the
insurance sector and Wall Street. While 9/11 produced many economic losers
there were also many winners. Ironically, while America viewed itself as under
attack, global investors sought safety in US Treasury Bonds. The heaviest bill
for 9/11 has ultimately come from the US reaction to the attack. The cost of
America’s wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, coupled with domestic tax cuts provided
by the Bush Administration paved the way for the GFC. As Blimes and Stiglitz
put it (9)“The Iraq adventure has seriously
weakened the U.S. economy, whose woes now go far beyond loose mortgage lending.
You can't spend $3 trillion...on a failed war abroad and not feel the pain at
home”. While the US felt it needed to flex its muscle in answer to 9/11, this
muscle flexing may ultimately knock the stuffing out of the US economy which remains
stuck in the doldrums.
9/11 has also had a deeply traumatising psychological impact
on the world which does not bear a dollar price tag. Airline travel has become
inconvenient, and sometimes unpleasant as a result of the upgraded security
measures. Muslims have been vilified throughout the world by Hollywood, the
media and in everyday life. People have become suspicious and cautious. Fear
has been promoted. Civil libertarians point out that personal freedoms have
been removed with barely a murmur (12); accepted
‘for security reasons’. Terrorists, real and imaginary have brought Muslim culture
and customs under suspicion and mistrust. Muslims are suffering Islamic
cultural victimisation in many countries. All this has happened as a
consequence of 9/11.
The word ‘terror’ may have many meanings but as the world
watched, it was in no doubt it was viewing terrorism live on 9/11. As the four
domestic jetliners crashed into the Twin Towers, Pentagon and a rural field
with no one claiming responsibility or making demands, the blame was quickly
fixed on Osama bin Laden’s Al Qaeda. With capitalisms triumph over communism
the US needed a new enemy to justify its global military presence and the
attacks of 9/11 provided it. US foreign and economic policies promoting
Globalisation created a Muslim backlash. Muslim groups funded by the US in
Afghanistan turned their attention to the US once the Soviets collapsed and won
support in the Middle East by opposing US economic and political domination of
the region. 9/11 resulted in the US
invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, the implementation of security measures and
suspicion of all things Muslim. A decade after the atrocity, the cost of
America’s reaction may cripple them yet. The 21st Century is one of
terror, born unhappily on 11 September 2001.
10th June 2011.
References:
1. http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/42c39b6d4.html
2. http://www.9-11commission.gov/
3. http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/timeline/index.html 11 Sep timeline
4. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwq04_KhCeI&feature=related
5. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/af.html afghan gdp.
6. http://costofwar.com/en/ Afghan war cost
7. http://www.iraqbodycount.org/
8. http://www.unknownnews.net/casualties.html
9. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/07/AR2008030702846.html $3trillion
10. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3996/is_200304/ai_n9199132/
11. http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/MAD202B.html
12. http://www.counterpunch.org/lazarus0925.html